Çok haklısınız ve dikkatiniz için teşekkür ederim. Standart makale formatını korumaya özen göstermeliydim.
İşte daha önceki yanıtlar gibi, akıcı makale formatında İngilizce olarak sunulan, tehlikeli içerikler hakkındaki bilgi:
Hazardous Ingredients in Cosmetics: CMRs, Endocrine Disruptors, and PFAS
The oversight of Hazardous Ingredients is paramount in the European Union’s (EU) approach to cosmetic safety assessment. The regulatory framework, primarily governed by the Cosmetic Products Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, is deliberately restrictive, adopting a cautionary stance towards chemicals that pose a threat to human health or the environment. This scrutiny targets specific groups, notably Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, and Reprotoxic substances (CMRs), chemicals acting as Endocrine Disruptors (EDCs), and the persistent Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).
1. The Strict Ban on CMR Substances
CMR substances represent the highest level of concern. These are chemicals classified as Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, or Toxic for Reproduction.
The EU implements a near-absolute prohibition principle for these substances. Under Article 15 of the Cosmetic Regulation, any substance classified as a Category 1A (known) or Category 1B (presumed) CMR under the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation is automatically banned from use in cosmetic products and is added to Annex II (the list of prohibited substances).
This automatic ban system is strictly maintained through periodic legislative updates, often referred to as “Omnibus Acts,” which immediately integrate new CLP hazard classifications into the Cosmetic Regulation, ensuring that hazardous substances are swiftly removed from the market. Limited and highly specific exemptions may be granted only for Category 2 (suspected) CMRs, provided rigorous SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) assessment proves their safety for the intended cosmetic use.
2. Targeting Endocrine Disruptors (EDCs)
Endocrine Disruptors are chemicals that interfere with the body’s hormone system. While they do not face the same automatic prohibition as CMRs, the EU has a focused strategy to manage them due to the risk associated with cumulative, low-dose exposure from consumer products.
The European Commission addresses these concerns by creating a priority list of potential EDCs used in cosmetics. Substances on this list (including certain parabens or UV filters) are subjected to comprehensive, individual risk assessments by the SCCS. The assessment considers all routes of exposure and potential effects.
Based on the scientific opinion of the SCCS, the Commission determines the substance’s Regulatory Status. This can lead to a complete ban (Annex II) or, more commonly, to strict limitations on its use, such as maximum authorized concentrations or restrictions to certain product types (Annex III). This ensures that while innovation is not halted, consumer safety is maintained by limiting exposure to a demonstrably safe level.
3. The Emergent Challenge of PFAS
PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances), known for their persistent and bioaccumulative nature, are facing increasing regulatory pressure. These substances, sometimes used in cosmetics for smooth application or water resistance, are primarily being targeted through two intertwined regulations:
- Cosmetic Regulation: Specific PFAS that already have a CMR classification (e.g., PFOS and PFOA) are banned under the aforementioned Article 15 rule.
- REACH Regulation: The primary regulatory movement involves a massive restriction proposal under the REACH framework, aiming to ban the entire group of PFAS chemicals for all non-essential uses across the EU.
Since the Cosmetic Regulation focuses narrowly on human health risks, the broad PFAS ban is being implemented via REACH, which can address the crucial environmental persistence and accumulation risks. This multi-pronged regulatory approach highlights the EU’s commitment to eliminating “forever chemicals” from consumer goods, necessitating prompt reformulation by the cosmetics industry.
